Epistemological Questions: A Workable Objectivity


"Objectivity does not require taking God's perspective, which is impossible." -Mark Johnson

Early scientists and social scientists thought that they could discover the world as it really was. By adhering to strict standards and methods they thought that they could unearth facts without any doubt as to the validity of the results. Today, we know that social and cultural baggage cannot be excluded or dismissed. The results that our scientists come up with are bound not only linguistically to a culture, but also the philosophy backing the pursuit of truth is culturally bound. We are in fact unable to see reality "as it really is". But this is not the end of the discussion, but rather the beginning. The realization of our limitations only gives us a clearer view of what it is we know and how it relates to us, others, and the world as it stands. It comes to this point that objectivity, as it was once understood, needs to be redefined in light of this new understanding. Just because our subjectivity gets in the way of reality, as it were, it does not mean we should throw away all knowledge as tainted goods.

However limited we need to realize that a workable objectivity can lead us, at least, to a shadow of truth. The words we use to describe the objects around us, the events that occur, and the ideas we have are not completely disconnected from the objects themselves. The observations we have are in fact based on those objects and reflect, at least, a slice of reality as we see it. The real objectivity and knowledge gathering occurs not when one single person researches an object, event, or idea, but rather when multiple peoples interact with material, scrutinize it, criticize it, become skeptical of it, and discuss it. The real knowledge gathering occurs when we interact and bounce our individual perspectives off one another to come to some consensus about the reality "out there".

This small amount of knowledge that we have, though fraught with cultural, social, and linguistic pitfalls, is all we have. It is comforting, however, to realize that our observations, though unable to describe the world as it really is, is based on that world and in turn reflect our view of things. Some call this view "practical realism", I call it our only real hope of gaining useful knowledge for ourselves.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Python 3.4 - Caesar Cipher

UML - Use Case Diagram